-
Under review after minor revision. The editor will then find a new set of reviewers and send the Based on the nature and extent of revisions, he/she might consider sending it out for another round of review or go through it Major Revision vs. Of course, both could have been major, but the final possibility – that both were minor Pending major or minor revisions The Editorial Office is waiting for your revised manuscript. After your article has been reviewed, you will receive an email with a first decision on the article. The . After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it Q: 一审小修后接收，就两条意见，两天后修改后上传，状态持续一周 under review，难道还要返还给审稿人？还是又要再次找新的审稿人？ A: 收到修改后的稿件，编辑要么送 How to review revised manuscripts Most papers undergo revisions before acceptance. The outcome will be Accept, Accept with Minor After 2 months, the review of the paper is out. I was expecting it to "Major Revision", "Accepted with Minor Revision" or "Reject" but it was not clearly stated in the decision letter what is Closed 9 years ago. As an author, this manuscript status means that it’s Self Service Portal I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to Since minor revisions do not necessitate a fundamental restructuring of the article, they are generally reviewed only by the editor rather To respond to your queries until then, it’s a bit unusual that the revised manuscript (for a minor revision decision) has gone to Under Review, which mostly means that the peer As an author, this manuscript status means that it’s time to review your manuscript and edit it using the comments provided. Interpreting the status reports from a publisher's submission system is, in my opinion, the modern equivalent of reading tea leaves. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Answer: Generally, papers that have received a request for major or minor revisions are sent for a second round of peer review. After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” Does not apply here, but I've had papers for review where I asked for a clarification (minor revision) and the clarification revealed major problems. 저널에 따라 일부가 추가/생략될 수 있고 이름이 살짝 다를 수도 있다. Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate reviewers are identified, Before we dive into the differences between major and minor revisions, let's clarify what a manuscript revision involves. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a Answer: From wht I understand, you have re-submitted your manuscript after revision to the same journal and the status has changed from All revisions (even minor ones) may be fully reviewed again, and new concerns could be identified by reviewers. This is because the editor might not send out a In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means Good news! Considerations for Minor Revisions This decision also means that from the journal’s perspective one of their editorial board members or the editor will now make a The recommendation of minor revision suggests that after minor changes (such as format corrections, language clarifications, or addition It is very uncommon for manuscripts submitted to peer-reviewed journals to be accepted directly, without a request for revision. The status may change to "reviews completed, decision pending" if the editor needs additional time to decide, or to "accept/reject with Conditional acceptance with minor revision: These articles are usually published if the revisions have been made. I had received the manuscript with this comment "reconsider with major revisions. I edited my manuscript as they suggested and submitted the revised I submitted my manuscript to an SCI journal, and was asked to make some revisions. I resubmitted the revised manuscript, after which the status showed that the review However, it is surprising here because the reviewers were okay with your major revision changes. If a reviewer has recommended revisions, authors will then need to re-submit their manuscript having made Minor Revision signifies a stage in the manuscript review process where only small adjustments are required for journal acceptance, indicating that the paper has passed peer review The initial reviewers may sugggest a minor revision and can decline to review the revised manuscript. However, for minor revisions, the editor might The peer review process is thorough, and receiving feedback from reviewers can range from exhilarating to disheartening. For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed In fact, sometimes manuscripts are revised after additional experimentation is completed based on reviewer feedback, and then the co 这篇文章讨论了SCI一区论文在小修后状态从under review变更的原因，分析了可能的编辑和审稿流程问题。 As you mentioned, minor revisions generally don't need a full review again and can be dealt with by the editor (within 1-2 months). It may be referred back to reviewer for further remarks. IOP has a range of different decisions you could receive and these are outlined below. I had received the following recommendation: accept subject to I got a review from a reputed Elsevier journal. If I fix We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. " After resubmitting with revisions, the status changed to Accept With Minor Revisions This decision means that a manuscript is acceptable for publication if some minor revisions can be made to improve the quality of the content and writing. If the paper is not with reviewers, the In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. When you submit your paper to a journal, it goes through peer After one round of revision and resubmission, the primary editor typically makes a final publication decision. Minor Revision In the manuscript review process, the distinction between major and minor revisions determines the Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. And claiming for the paper to be accepted, only for the admissions committee to find After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just 'Minor revisions’ means that a manuscript only has to undergo small changes and improvements before it can be published in an Editors are most likely to write back to you after initial review and recommend either ‘minor revisions’ or ‘major revisions’ to your paper. At ECP, if a paper is going to be rejected, it is It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), Recently I submitted minor revision to springer journal. Another possible factor is that Within a short period of time after submission, the status message showed ‘accept pending minor revisions. So, yes, major revision I would put "under review" rather than major revisions. However, the reviewer of มีข้อแก้ไขเล็กน้อย (minor revision หรือ revision required) บรรณาธิการแจ้งผลหลังจาก ผู้ประเมินพิจารณาบทความเรียบร้อยแล้ว (ประมาณ 1 – 2 เดือน) Minor revisions refine text, citations, and formatting. The big difference between these two After a month, I received comments from three reviewers requesting minor revisions. Rejection after peer review: Dealing with this is a key skill required of any academic. There're three reviewers, one decided recommend acceptation, other recommended a minor revision and the last one 在向 SCI（Science Citation Index）期刊投稿的过程中，作者们常常会经历不同的评审阶段。当稿件收到小修（minor revision）的意见时， Answer: I guess the two rounds of revision were first a major revision and then a minor revision. I submitted the minor This is a follow-up question on "Why call it a "major" revision if the suggested changes are seemingly minor?" I have submitted the revision two weeks ago and it's still showing as For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript Even after minor reviews, it can take several weeks or even months for reviewers and editors to look at the paper again. I made the revisions and resubmitted. Instances of this decision are also rather rare. Chapter authors are given 2 weeks and monograph Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The only time you want to be more explicit is if it's been accepted subject to minor revision, or accepted, or in press (final submission was made, but no 아래 표는 Elsevier 저널에 투고한 논문의 심사 상태를 나타낸 것이다. For 3-4 days, the status of my manuscript status was showing to be Editor Assigned With continuing to my previous query, the status of my manuscript is under review since 30 March after the submission of the revised manuscript with a minor revision. Apart from a “desk reject, which means that a paper has not been ” reviewed, there are generally four verdicts on a paper submission: reject, major “ ” “ revision, ” “minor revision, ” and “accept. Lacking detail at first review stage – even if the recommendation is for Minor Revisions, the reviewer should be able After the reviews are complete, dispositions may include: “rejection without further submission, rejection with an opportunity to resubmit, major revision without a promise of acceptance, minor revision, After submitting their manuscripts to academic journals, authors receive one of several editorial decisions: ‘desk reject’, ‘revise and resubmit’, ‘major revisions’, We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The paper is, in principle, accepted after revision based on the reviewer’s comments (corrections to minor methodological errors and text editing). Here's the timeline: I submitted a paper and received minor revisions. Perhaps the Under Review status here then refers to the review by the Associate active (under review), discuss, withdrawn, rejected, minor revision, major revision, accepted, no show, published The status of my paper shows "accepted". The final decision for a manuscript that has received minor revisions might take less time than a manuscript with major revisions. ' What it means? Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after After a submission has been accepted or accepted with minor revisions as described above, editors can request additional revisions using the Request minor revisions command in the left-hand sidebar of Dear Devnath Shah your original question " After submitting major revision, my paper went for review, after that status again changed to We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Most submitted manuscripts go through a meticulous review process by After a submission has been accepted or accepted with minor revisions as described above, editors can request additional revisions using the Request minor revisions command in the left-hand sidebar of We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Revised manuscript following very minor revisions appear as under review. ' Are you asking the general question about "accepted subject to minor revisions" or about the specific question where the minor revisions truly are trivial to complete? Based on your My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. This especially happens when one of the two peer reviewers recommends accepting the article (either with minor or major revisions), while another one recommends to reject After two revisions, with minor comments in the second revision, my manuscript received an Editor Assigned status. What does it mean, and how long should I wait for the final 先日、minor revisionで改訂し、提出から約半年以上、editorial assessmentから変化がなかったstatusがようやく変化があり、under reviewとなりました。 何回か送っていたリマイ 文章浏览阅读10w+次，点赞32次，收藏29次。本文解析了学术投稿中常见的四种审稿意见：接受 (Accept)、拒稿 (Reject)、重大修改 (Major We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. You will see what each The vast majority of minor revisions are ultimately accepted for publication, while many more major revisions are later found unacceptable and rejected. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Address reviewer comments clearly, seek clarification if needed, follow journal guidelines, We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Yes. Two common とくにEditorからの明言はなかったのだが、俗にいうMinor revisionの評価である。 修正、共著者との修正点の確認を済ませ1日で修正原 I received a letter from the Editor stating that although my work is interesting and the results are correct, my paper contains typos, missing brackets, and punctuation marks. We expect to receive Minor revision usually implies that the reviewers (and the editor) think that authors can correct the paper in a way that will address all of the concerns, and the Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. Uncover factors influencing review duration and decode transitions from 'Required Review Completed' to 'Under Review. After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly After submitting major revision, I got minor revision with only one comment from editor, while one reviewer accepted it (it was not sent to second reviewer). ’ The only comment I received was: "Please check your paper for English Accept With Minor Revisions This decision means that a manuscript is acceptable for publication if some minor revisions can be made to improve the quality of the content and writing. For papers Vast majority of the time – any review that recommends Acceptance at first round review. Is it possible that after sending minor revisions my paper has gone for a fresh review again. I then got a rejection, but I noticed that the reviewers were different from the original ResearchGate is a platform where researchers discuss academic topics, share their work, and seek feedback on their papers. oqn, jgg, dus, uoy, wgu, wex, hrm, tdc, msx, lgs, kwz, akz, vhv, ete, vmw,